Author eric.smith
Recipients Arfrever, barry, eli.bendersky, eric.araujo, eric.smith, ethan.furman, georg.brandl, mrabarnett, pitrou, r.david.murray, rhettinger, sbt, serhiy.storchaka, theller, tim.peters, vstinner
Date 2013-09-17.14:19:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <52386504.8060102@trueblade.com>
In-reply-to <52386357.3060701@trueblade.com>
Content
On 09/17/2013 10:12 AM, Eric V. Smith wrote:
> On the other hand, I don't have a use case for the original key, anyway.
> So I don't have a strong feeling about this, other than it feels odd
> that the answer to the original question (I think on python-dev) "how do
> we get the original key back?" is answered by "by giving you the
> original key and its value".

I meant: I don't have a use case for finding the original key outside of
iterating over items().
History
Date User Action Args
2013-09-17 14:19:52eric.smithsetrecipients: + eric.smith, tim.peters, barry, theller, georg.brandl, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, eric.araujo, mrabarnett, Arfrever, r.david.murray, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman, sbt, serhiy.storchaka
2013-09-17 14:19:52eric.smithlinkissue18986 messages
2013-09-17 14:19:52eric.smithcreate