Message196798
On 02.09.2013 18:56, Serhiy Storchaka wrote:
>
> Oh, I were blind. Thank you Marc-Andre. Here is corrected patch. Unfortunately it 1.4-1.5 times slower on UTF-16 encoding UCS2 strings than previous wrong patch.
I think it would be faster to do this in two steps:
1. check the ranges of the input
2. do a memcpy() if there are no lone surrogates
Part 1 can be further optimized by adding a simple range
check (ch >= 0xd800). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-09-02 18:03:19 | lemburg | set | recipients:
+ lemburg, gvanrossum, loewis, vstinner, ezio.melotti, tchrist, kennyluck, serhiy.storchaka |
2013-09-02 18:03:19 | lemburg | link | issue12892 messages |
2013-09-02 18:03:19 | lemburg | create | |
|