Message196081
Reopening this - rewording the issue title to cover the problem to be solved (i.e. accounting for RFC 6598 addresses) rather than a specific solution (which isn't appropriate, since the RFC *explicitly* states that shared addresses and private addresses aren't the same thing)
It seems to me that the simplest solution would be to use the terminology from RFC 6598 and add a new "is_shared" attribute to addresses. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-08-24 15:03:15 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, terry.reedy, jcea, macfreek, christian.heimes, pmoody, santoso.wijaya, leim |
2013-08-24 15:03:15 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1377356595.85.0.880570551558.issue17400@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-08-24 15:03:15 | ncoghlan | link | issue17400 messages |
2013-08-24 15:03:15 | ncoghlan | create | |
|