Author pitrou
Recipients eli.bendersky, flox, jcea, pitrou, python-dev, scoder
Date 2013-08-23.21:59:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1377295166.2520.32.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1377293319.3.0.297773094999.issue17741@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> The problem is that you are duplicating an existing class (the
> XMLParser) for no good reason

No. The logic was already in _IterParseIterator, just wrapped up
differently.

And the proof is that the original commit, while adding a feature,
*removed* code from xml.etree:

$ hg di -c f903cf864191 --stat Lib/xml/etree/
 Lib/xml/etree/ElementTree.py |  209
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
 1 files changed, 97 insertions(+), 112 deletions(-)

> This goes completely against the design of the existing API and
> counters the reusability of the existing code.

No it doesn't. It irritates you, for some reason, but your feelings are
not a valid reason to revert a useful feature. And this issue is not for
you to repeat the same stubborn line of argument again and again. I'm
extremely bored, and I won't care about your comments anymore.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-08-23 21:59:34pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, jcea, scoder, eli.bendersky, flox, python-dev
2013-08-23 21:59:34pitroulinkissue17741 messages
2013-08-23 21:59:34pitroucreate