Author pitrou
Recipients alex, christian.heimes, dstufft, hynek, jcea, neologix, pitrou, tarek, vstinner
Date 2013-08-16.17:37:37
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1376674650.2510.7.camel@fsol>
In-reply-to <1376674424.89.0.141447255493.issue18756@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> So as of right now afaik none of the sources of cryptographically
> secure random in the python stdlib offer a way to open a persistent
> FD. The primary question on my mind is if os.urandom can't be modified
> to maintain a persistent FD can Python offer a urandom class that
> *will* maintain a persistent FD?

Well, if we want to offer such a facility, let's bundle it in
os.urandom(). It would be suboptimal to have two slightly different
implementations of the same thing.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-08-16 17:37:38pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, jcea, vstinner, christian.heimes, tarek, alex, neologix, hynek, dstufft
2013-08-16 17:37:38pitroulinkissue18756 messages
2013-08-16 17:37:37pitroucreate