Author ethan.furman
Recipients amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, cvrebert, eli.bendersky, eric.snow, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, ncoghlan, pitrou, rhettinger
Date 2013-08-02.23:55:58
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1375487758.54.0.628790032916.issue18264@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
I'll check you patch later against big numbers (which is where I had difficulties).  If it works I'll try to make it more complete.  If it doesn't, I've been working on just extraction the Enum member's value and using that (works fine on the Python side ;) .

Big Question:  if the Enum member was used as a key, do we use .name or .value?  The decision I went with was to compare the hashes of the member name vs the member itself -- if they're the same, use the .name, otherwise use the value.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-08-02 23:55:58ethan.furmansetrecipients: + ethan.furman, gvanrossum, barry, rhettinger, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, eli.bendersky, cvrebert, eric.snow
2013-08-02 23:55:58ethan.furmansetmessageid: <1375487758.54.0.628790032916.issue18264@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-08-02 23:55:58ethan.furmanlinkissue18264 messages
2013-08-02 23:55:58ethan.furmancreate