Message192842
> Since this is such an incredibly niche edge case
> (the ordered comparison has to return NotImplemented
> while __eq__ returns True),
*and* the types are explicitly supposed to ordered,
based on what is being tested
> I remaining consistent with the existing behaviour
> is the most important consideration.
Agreed, once I consider that additional caveat. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-07-10 22:43:02 | Jim.Jewett | set | recipients:
+ Jim.Jewett, rhettinger, ncoghlan, eric.araujo, lregebro, francescor, catalin.iacob, python-dev, javawizard, codemiller |
2013-07-10 22:43:01 | Jim.Jewett | set | messageid: <1373496181.96.0.479344441855.issue10042@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-07-10 22:43:01 | Jim.Jewett | link | issue10042 messages |
2013-07-10 22:43:01 | Jim.Jewett | create | |
|