➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author barry
Recipients barry, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman, ncoghlan, pitrou
Date 2013-06-19.13:41:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20130619094124.45ba8e80@anarchist>
In-reply-to <1371624343.74.0.0549181619169.issue17961@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content 
On Jun 19, 2013, at 06:45 AM, Ethan Furman wrote:

>To sum up: the name is already available in the name, no need to have it be
>the value as well.  I am open to changing the start value to zero instead of
>one (which is what I do in my customization of Enum in my personal modules ;)

I'm sure it's obvious that I prefer start-from-one, and aside from the
truthiness question, it would maximize compatibility with flufl.enum.
Besides, the functional API accepts a sequence so if you *really* wanted
start-from-zero, then you can do it easily.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-06-19 13:41:29barrysetrecipients: + barry, ncoghlan, pitrou, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman
2013-06-19 13:41:29barrylinkissue17961 messages
2013-06-19 13:41:29barrycreate