Author vstinner
Recipients Rhamphoryncus, amaury.forgeotdarc, barry, gregory.p.smith, jlaurila, jszakmeister, kristjan.jonsson, ncoghlan, neilo, pitrou, pjmcnerney, rhettinger, tlesher, vstinner
Date 2013-06-11.11:59:00
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAMpsgwbNgGA+2zyum-oTX-JXETox45-8vCR7+uaaH_=JsACPCg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1370940349.04.0.518100182958.issue3329@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Amaury Forgeot d'Arc added the comment:
> I prefer the new version without PYMEM_TRACE_MALLOC :-)

Well, py_setallocators-filename.patch is more a proof-of-concept
showing how to use my Py_SetAllocators() API to pass the C trace
(filename/line number), than a real proposition. The patch is very
intrusive and huge, I also prefer py_setallocators-3.patch :-)

> Can we rename "API" and "api_id" to something more specific? maybe DOMAIN and domain_id?

Something like:
{PY_ALLOC_MEM_DOMAIN, PY_ALLOC_OBJECT_DOMAIN}.
or
{PYMEM_DOMAIN, PYOBJECT_DOMAIN}
?

There are only two values, another option is to duplicate functions:
- PyMem_GetAllocators(), PyMem_SetAllocators(), PyMem_Malloc(), ..
- PyObject_GetAllocators(), PyObject_SetAllocators(), PyObject_Malloc(), ..

I prefer PyMem_SetAllocators() over PYOBJECT_DOMAIN.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-06-11 11:59:00vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, barry, rhettinger, gregory.p.smith, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, Rhamphoryncus, pitrou, kristjan.jonsson, jszakmeister, tlesher, jlaurila, neilo, pjmcnerney
2013-06-11 11:59:00vstinnerlinkissue3329 messages
2013-06-11 11:59:00vstinnercreate