Author eli.bendersky
Recipients alex, barry, benjamin.peterson, docs@python, dstufft, eli.bendersky, ethan.furman, ezio.melotti, gvanrossum, isoschiz, ncoghlan, pconnell, python-dev, zach.ware
Date 2013-06-08.16:00:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1370707219.47.0.187037191393.issue17947@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Nick prudently moved the unique discussion to its own issue - 18042. Let's get the initial implementation & docs committed first (without unique in the implementation, although it's fine to have it as an example in the docs for now), close this issue, and then discuss in 18042 whether unique should be part of the stdlib-provided API or not.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-06-08 16:00:19eli.benderskysetrecipients: + eli.bendersky, gvanrossum, barry, ncoghlan, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, alex, docs@python, ethan.furman, python-dev, zach.ware, pconnell, dstufft, isoschiz
2013-06-08 16:00:19eli.benderskysetmessageid: <1370707219.47.0.187037191393.issue17947@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-06-08 16:00:19eli.benderskylinkissue17947 messages
2013-06-08 16:00:19eli.benderskycreate