Author Seppo.Yli-Olli
Recipients Jeffrey.Armstrong, Martin.Fiers, Pete.Forman, RubyTuesdayDONO, Seppo.Yli-Olli, alexis, cmcqueen1975, danmbox, doko, eric.araujo, geertj, jonforums, jwilk, loewis, oscarbenjamin, paul.moore, pje, renatosilva, rpetrov, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, schmir, tarek
Date 2013-05-25.08:59:52
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1369472392.67.0.438657598545.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Since Renata's ERRATA was unclear to whether or not this was *actually* removed (please point to a changeset if the option was removed):
If the option is no longer required by Pidgin and that was the original reason to have it in the first, there's really no reason *not* to remove this, no?

Eg this code
> int main() { return 0; }
Fails to compile on MingW gcc 4.6 and 4.7 when passing -mno-cygwin to gcc. The solution that distutils does not work with current versions of MingW (and GCC) for good is unacceptable so the only working solution is removal of no-cygwin. Just that GCC 4.4 would support the flag does not change this bug one way or the other.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-05-25 08:59:52Seppo.Yli-Ollisetrecipients: + Seppo.Yli-Olli, loewis, doko, paul.moore, pje, geertj, schmir, tarek, jwilk, eric.araujo, rpetrov, cmcqueen1975, rubenvb, santoso.wijaya, alexis, jonforums, RubyTuesdayDONO, Jeffrey.Armstrong, danmbox, Martin.Fiers, oscarbenjamin, Pete.Forman, renatosilva
2013-05-25 08:59:52Seppo.Yli-Ollisetmessageid: <1369472392.67.0.438657598545.issue12641@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-05-25 08:59:52Seppo.Yli-Ollilinkissue12641 messages
2013-05-25 08:59:52Seppo.Yli-Ollicreate