Message188845
Thanks for your response, Martin.
Martin v. Löwis wrote:
> Zach: Temporarily committing changes to test specific buildbot issues
> is fine
I suppose it would also be beneficial to get some output from the other bots which are *not* failing, to have something to compare with. In that case, here's a (very) temporary patch we can try for a round of builds.
> asking the slave operator for direct access to the machine
> may also work.
Trent, what's your policy on letting non-committers play around in your machines? :) Alternately, do you know of anything about that machine that could be causing the failures? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | set | recipients:
+ zach.ware, loewis, terry.reedy, amaury.forgeotdarc, trent, ezio.melotti, roger.serwy, Todd.Rovito, python-dev |
2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | set | messageid: <1368201643.64.0.626678372455.issue17883@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | link | issue17883 messages |
2013-05-10 16:00:43 | zach.ware | create | |
|