This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author pitrou
Recipients belopolsky, cben, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, giampaolo.rodola, larry, lesmana, loewis, mark.dickinson, ned.deily, pitrou, python-dev, r.david.murray, ronaldoussoren, serhiy.storchaka, steven.daprano, tshepang
Date 2013-05-06.14:52:07
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
> Well, post it to python-dev and see what reaction you get :)

I'm not interested in python-dev reactions here. For this
kind of issue, we'll have hundreds of messages for and against
the change without any useful content.

The commit adds an often-requested feature (to the point that many
people were already taking the pain of activating it manually).
But, yes, we could add Steven's refinement so that all bases are
Date User Action Args
2013-05-06 14:52:07pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, loewis, ronaldoussoren, mark.dickinson, cben, belopolsky, larry, giampaolo.rodola, ned.deily, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, steven.daprano, r.david.murray, flox, lesmana, tshepang, python-dev, serhiy.storchaka
2013-05-06 14:52:07pitroulinkissue5845 messages
2013-05-06 14:52:07pitroucreate