Author paul.j3
Recipients amcnabb, bethard, docs@python, guilherme-pg, paul.j3, r.david.murray, v+python
Date 2013-04-23.21:22:13
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1366752133.34.0.173016193352.issue14191@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Yes, http://bugs.python.org/msg166175 does use 'parse_args' in the second call.  But I think things would be more flexible if we had a second function:

    def parse_???(self, args=None, namespace=None):
        args, argv = self.parse_intermixed_args(args, namespace)
        if argv:
            msg = _('unrecognized arguments: %s')
            self.error(msg % ' '.join(argv))
        return args

But then what would a be a good pair of names?

parse??? and parse_intermixed_args
versus
parse_intermixed_args and parse_known_intermixed_args
or
something else?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-04-23 21:22:13paul.j3setrecipients: + paul.j3, amcnabb, bethard, v+python, r.david.murray, docs@python, guilherme-pg
2013-04-23 21:22:13paul.j3setmessageid: <1366752133.34.0.173016193352.issue14191@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-04-23 21:22:13paul.j3linkissue14191 messages
2013-04-23 21:22:13paul.j3create