Message187669
Yes, http://bugs.python.org/msg166175 does use 'parse_args' in the second call. But I think things would be more flexible if we had a second function:
def parse_???(self, args=None, namespace=None):
args, argv = self.parse_intermixed_args(args, namespace)
if argv:
msg = _('unrecognized arguments: %s')
self.error(msg % ' '.join(argv))
return args
But then what would a be a good pair of names?
parse??? and parse_intermixed_args
versus
parse_intermixed_args and parse_known_intermixed_args
or
something else? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-04-23 21:22:13 | paul.j3 | set | recipients:
+ paul.j3, amcnabb, bethard, v+python, r.david.murray, docs@python, guilherme-pg |
2013-04-23 21:22:13 | paul.j3 | set | messageid: <1366752133.34.0.173016193352.issue14191@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-04-23 21:22:13 | paul.j3 | link | issue14191 messages |
2013-04-23 21:22:13 | paul.j3 | create | |
|