This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author benjamin.peterson
Recipients Anssi.Kääriäinen, amaury.forgeotdarc, benjamin.peterson, docs@python, isoschiz, ncoghlan, pconnell, pitrou, vstinner
Date 2013-04-20.13:19:42
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In a sense, doing something like "with self.lock" in a generator is already a leak. Even if there wasn't a cycle, collection could be arbitrarily delayed (in partincular on non-CPython VMs). I wonder if making generators context managers which call close() on exit would help.
Date User Action Args
2013-04-20 13:19:43benjamin.petersonsetrecipients: + benjamin.peterson, amaury.forgeotdarc, ncoghlan, pitrou, vstinner, docs@python, Anssi.Kääriäinen, pconnell, isoschiz
2013-04-20 13:19:43benjamin.petersonsetmessageid: <>
2013-04-20 13:19:43benjamin.petersonlinkissue17468 messages
2013-04-20 13:19:42benjamin.petersoncreate