Message185357
> Richard was saying that you shouldn't serialize such a large array,
> that's just a huge performance bottleneck. The right way would be
> to use a shared memory.
Gotcha, for clarification, my original use case was to *create* them
in the other process (something which took some time since they were
calculated and not just random as in the example) and returned to the
original process for further computation... |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-27 17:52:49 | mrjbq7 | set | recipients:
+ mrjbq7, pitrou, neologix, sbt |
2013-03-27 17:52:49 | mrjbq7 | set | messageid: <1364406769.62.0.130269600774.issue17560@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-27 17:52:49 | mrjbq7 | link | issue17560 messages |
2013-03-27 17:52:49 | mrjbq7 | create | |
|