This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.araujo
Recipients Arfrever, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger, terry.reedy, tshepang, vstinner
Date 2013-03-24.07:05:05
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1364108706.36.0.0954691462546.issue13248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> We do not document removals after they are done as they are not an
> issue for back-compatibility (unlike changes and additions).

I learned that people may use the (for example) 2.7 docs even though they are using 2.6, so I think we do want to use things like the deprecated-removed directive to tell these users that they should start looking for a replacement.  Removing documentation would lead them to look in other places and discover the removals later.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-24 07:05:06eric.araujosetrecipients: + eric.araujo, rhettinger, terry.reedy, pitrou, vstinner, giampaolo.rodola, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, flox, tshepang, python-dev
2013-03-24 07:05:06eric.araujosetmessageid: <1364108706.36.0.0954691462546.issue13248@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-24 07:05:06eric.araujolinkissue13248 messages
2013-03-24 07:05:05eric.araujocreate