Author gward
Recipients barry, durin42, gward, ncoghlan, pitrou, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date 2013-03-19.05:31:34
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1363671094.52.0.428191382998.issue17445@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Thanks for the review, Terry! Here is a revised patch, now on trunk:

  http://hg.gerg.ca/cpython/rev/6dedcdbe7cd5

I believe I have addressed all of your concerns.

Note also that the tests now highlight some dubious behaviour. Further feedback is welcome!

I'm happy to rebase onto 3.3 if folks generally agree it's safe. (It seems fine to me; IMHO being unable to handle bytes is a regression relative to Python 2.)
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-19 05:31:34gwardsetrecipients: + gward, barry, terry.reedy, ncoghlan, pitrou, durin42, r.david.murray
2013-03-19 05:31:34gwardsetmessageid: <1363671094.52.0.428191382998.issue17445@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-19 05:31:34gwardlinkissue17445 messages
2013-03-19 05:31:34gwardcreate