Author orsenthil
Recipients demian.brecht, ezio.melotti, orsenthil, r.david.murray, terry.reedy
Date 2013-03-18.14:25:54
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1363616755.23.0.631482346739.issue17272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Sorry for taking long time to respond. full_url has been in the shape it is for many versions, changing it in backwards incompatible way be do more harm than good.

- I would be really interested to know why the present form of full_url presented any limitation for developing an client? Apart from get_full_url there are other ways to get full_url and url associated. Any details on "Why this is must"? The explain snippet below gives the assumption on full_url setting, I could not get need for change from this. Personally, I am 0 to -1 on this too, as in I cannot see a clear need for this change.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-03-18 14:25:55orsenthilsetrecipients: + orsenthil, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, demian.brecht
2013-03-18 14:25:55orsenthilsetmessageid: <1363616755.23.0.631482346739.issue17272@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-03-18 14:25:55orsenthillinkissue17272 messages
2013-03-18 14:25:54orsenthilcreate