Message183482
> I doubt about '\ud83d\udc9d' on wide build. Is it right to encode it as
> b'💝' and not as b'��'?
I don't think so. IIRC surrogates are invalid in UTF-32, and certainly shouldn't be recombined.
> This will be compatible with narrow build but will break compatibility
> with 3.3+. What is less evil?
I think it's better to be compatible with 3.3+. This is anyway a rather obscure corner case.
Do you want to propose a new patch? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-03-04 18:10:44 | ezio.melotti | set | recipients:
+ ezio.melotti, lemburg, vstinner, wiml, serhiy.storchaka |
2013-03-04 18:10:44 | ezio.melotti | set | messageid: <1362420644.05.0.788358961833.issue15866@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-03-04 18:10:44 | ezio.melotti | link | issue15866 messages |
2013-03-04 18:10:43 | ezio.melotti | create | |
|