Message182581
Thank you for clarifying this. While it still not seems really intuitive to me I can handle the behavior.
To summarize: It is not possible with re to have an optional ({0,1}) group that contains further subgroups, because re considers (0,0) to already fulfill the constraints for the outer group? |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-02-21 08:51:10 | Hendrik.Lemelson | set | recipients:
+ Hendrik.Lemelson, tim.peters, pitrou, ezio.melotti, mrabarnett |
2013-02-21 08:51:10 | Hendrik.Lemelson | set | messageid: <1361436670.33.0.361686398474.issue17257@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2013-02-21 08:51:10 | Hendrik.Lemelson | link | issue17257 messages |
2013-02-21 08:51:10 | Hendrik.Lemelson | create | |
|