Author barry
Recipients Arfrever, asvetlov, barry, brett.cannon, chris.jerdonek, cvrebert, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, pitrou, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2013-02-19.21:56:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <20130219165616.67b577c1@anarchist.wooz.org>
In-reply-to <1361303378.21.0.285956953726.issue15767@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
On Feb 19, 2013, at 07:49 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:

>Serihy & Barry: no. We do that now and it's already a nasty little hack. It
>would be better to let people catch an exception signaling that an import
>didn't happen because some module is missing than require introspection on a
>caught ImportError to tell what is going on (there's a reason why Antoine
>went to all of that trouble to add new exceptions so we don't have to look at
>the errno attribute on OSError). Exceptions are structured to work off of
>inheritance hierarchies (says the man who co-wrote the PEP to make all PEPs
>inherit from BaseException).

The difference being that checking errno on OSError/IOError is essentially
required to do anything useful with it, while this one seems like a rare
corner case (we've been doing pretty well without it so far).
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-19 21:56:19barrysetrecipients: + barry, brett.cannon, pitrou, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, cvrebert, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka
2013-02-19 21:56:19barrylinkissue15767 messages
2013-02-19 21:56:19barrycreate