➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author giampaolo.rodola
Recipients georg.brandl, giampaolo.rodola, pitrou
Date 2013-02-12.22:40:09
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1360708809.53.0.302633878748.issue17197@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
profile and cProfile modules define the same utility functions (run() and runctx()) which use the same code except the profiler class.
Considering that we're going to add 2 new utility functions (runcall() and runblock(), see issue9285 and issue17130) I think we should refactor the code in order to avoid this code duplication.
Patch in attachment does that.
The approach I came up with looks a bit hackish though so I'd like to get some feedback. Is it acceptable?
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-12 22:40:09giampaolo.rodolasetrecipients: + giampaolo.rodola, georg.brandl, pitrou
2013-02-12 22:40:09giampaolo.rodolasetmessageid: <1360708809.53.0.302633878748.issue17197@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-12 22:40:09giampaolo.rodolalinkissue17197 messages
2013-02-12 22:40:09giampaolo.rodolacreate