➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author serhiy.storchaka
Recipients Ramchandra Apte, eric.snow, pitrou, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka
Date 2013-02-02.09:11:19
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1359796279.24.0.604271302584.issue17100@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
> But rotate_at() / rotate_after() can probably be O(1), unless I'm missing something.

Hmm, perhaps. But only for current implementation. With more effective deque-like implementation (when linked list items grouped in fixed-size chunks) it will be O(n).
History
Date User Action Args
2013-02-02 09:11:19serhiy.storchakasetrecipients: + serhiy.storchaka, rhettinger, pitrou, eric.snow, Ramchandra Apte
2013-02-02 09:11:19serhiy.storchakasetmessageid: <1359796279.24.0.604271302584.issue17100@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-02-02 09:11:19serhiy.storchakalinkissue17100 messages
2013-02-02 09:11:19serhiy.storchakacreate