Message180991
> You didn't respond to the idea of exposing both features separately
> after saying you didn't understand what I meant and saying that they
> were pointless and didn't make sense. So I explained and also
> proposed a specific API to make the suggestion clearer and more
> concrete.
Well, suffice to say that I wasn't convinced at all. There are multiple
use cases for subtests in the Python test suite, but I can't think of
any for your proposed API separation. That's why I find it
uninteresting.
I'm making this proposal to solve a concrete issue, not in the interest
of minimalism. "Building block" was to be understood in that sense. Unit
testing is one of those areas where purity is a secondary concern. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2013-01-30 20:22:29 | pitrou | set | recipients:
+ pitrou, brett.cannon, spiv, exarkun, ncoghlan, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Arfrever, r.david.murray, michael.foord, brian.curtin, hpk, fperez, chris.jerdonek, Yaroslav.Halchenko, santoso.wijaya, nchauvat, Julian, abingham, eric.snow, serhiy.storchaka, borja.ruiz, bfroehle |
2013-01-30 20:22:29 | pitrou | link | issue16997 messages |
2013-01-30 20:22:28 | pitrou | create | |
|