This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author chris.jerdonek
Recipients bethard, chris.jerdonek, r.david.murray, terry.reedy, wim.glenn
Date 2013-01-15.11:36:51
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1358249812.91.0.860254598091.issue16468@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Attaching patch.  With this patch, passing a non-iterable choices argument to parser.add_argument() raises (for example):

Traceback (most recent call last):
  ...
  File ".../Lib/argparse.py", line 558, in _metavar_formatter
    choice_strs = [str(choice) for choice in action.choices]
TypeError: 'MyChoices' object is not iterable

instead of the incorrect:

  File ".../Lib/argparse.py", line 1333, in add_argument
    raise ValueError("length of metavar tuple does not match nargs")
ValueError: length of metavar tuple does not match nargs

Is it okay to change this exception type in maintenance releases?  The other option is to keep the error as a ValueError but to change the error message, though I think TypeError is the correct exception to allow through.  Note that the existing ValueError is preserved for other code paths.  Indeed, there are several tests checking for this ValueError and its error message, which the attached patch does not break.

If we want to consider accepting non-iterable choices for 3.4, we can still have that discussion as part of a separate patch.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-15 11:36:52chris.jerdoneksetrecipients: + chris.jerdonek, terry.reedy, bethard, r.david.murray, wim.glenn
2013-01-15 11:36:52chris.jerdoneksetmessageid: <1358249812.91.0.860254598091.issue16468@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2013-01-15 11:36:52chris.jerdoneklinkissue16468 messages
2013-01-15 11:36:52chris.jerdonekcreate