Author vstinner
Recipients Arfrever, amaury.forgeotdarc, asvetlov, christian.heimes, georg.brandl, grahamd, gregory.p.smith, jcea, pitrou, sbt, twouters, vstinner
Date 2013-01-14.09:13:27
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAMpsgwaz=nCC4QCcWkdsgmHJSKyDMQDUn07XPAF7RGzZvR32kg@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1358113380.32.0.00441020823972.issue16500@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> Might make sense to put this in atexit.atfork() to avoid small-module inflation?

It sounds strange to mix "at exit" and "at fork" in the same module.
Both are very different.

2013/1/13 Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <report@bugs.python.org>:
>
> Changes by Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis <Arfrever.FTA@GMail.Com>:
>
>
> ----------
> nosy: +Arfrever
>
> _______________________________________
> Python tracker <report@bugs.python.org>
> <http://bugs.python.org/issue16500>
> _______________________________________
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-14 09:13:28vstinnersetrecipients: + vstinner, twouters, georg.brandl, gregory.p.smith, jcea, amaury.forgeotdarc, pitrou, christian.heimes, grahamd, Arfrever, asvetlov, sbt
2013-01-14 09:13:28vstinnerlinkissue16500 messages
2013-01-14 09:13:27vstinnercreate