Author neologix
Recipients christian.heimes, felipecruz, giampaolo.rodola, gvanrossum, neologix, pitrou, rosslagerwall
Date 2013-01-04.19:57:41
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <CAH_1eM3ujtFE_6qgARNoJA+b9ABkN2hcnS_tkjTgQXqotPUsig@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to <1357325046.75.0.137198237604.issue16853@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
Indeed, tornado and pyftpdlib implementations are much more complex,
have somewhat different APIs (i.e. only support FDs), have special
cases for older python versions, lack some newer features (e.g.
context manager).
The current code is much close to Tulip's.

> Exploring this into Tulip would be important IMO, as it would help figuring out whether the API is good enough to support what this component aims to achieve: being a generic poller upon which to build async IO loops.

That's indeed a good idea, there's no need to rush this in.
History
Date User Action Args
2013-01-04 19:57:42neologixsetrecipients: + neologix, gvanrossum, pitrou, giampaolo.rodola, christian.heimes, rosslagerwall, felipecruz
2013-01-04 19:57:42neologixlinkissue16853 messages
2013-01-04 19:57:41neologixcreate