Message177824
I'd use runpy.run_path if I could, but it's not available on Python 2.6 - that's why I'm using run_module.
A lot of setup.py files out there use __file__ to compute additional package names, package data locations etc. - this can lead to bogus package names computed blindly from paths assumed to be relative, when the setup.py file is run using run_module. I'm not sure what you mean when you say "looks consistent" - ISTM there is a difference, i.e. inconsistency, between a direct run and a run via run_module. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-12-20 14:18:01 | vinay.sajip | set | recipients:
+ vinay.sajip, ncoghlan, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-12-20 14:18:01 | vinay.sajip | set | messageid: <1356013081.23.0.884077461212.issue16737@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-12-20 14:18:01 | vinay.sajip | link | issue16737 messages |
2012-12-20 14:18:01 | vinay.sajip | create | |
|