This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author gregory.p.smith
Recipients Trundle, alex, asvetlov, barry, bfroehle, chris.jerdonek, daniel.urban, david.villa, dmalcolm, eric.smith, ezio.melotti, gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, jcea, jkloth, larry, mark.dickinson, pitrou, skrah, v+python
Date 2012-12-14.20:11:03
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
There's a bit of an impasse here on the PEP front.  Guido said it wasn't needed.  Antoine brings up the point that CPython developers will have to live with the result of this work so maybe something more easy to read and see in one place like a PEP would be valuable...

That said, I think a lot of that has been done if you look at the clinic.txt file within the patch.  That already contains the meat of what would go into a PEP.

What more is required?  I personally think we should iterate on this via checked in code in 3.4.
Date User Action Args
2012-12-14 20:11:03gregory.p.smithsetrecipients: + gregory.p.smith, gvanrossum, barry, jcea, mark.dickinson, pitrou, larry, eric.smith, jkloth, ezio.melotti, v+python, alex, Trundle, asvetlov, skrah, dmalcolm, daniel.urban, chris.jerdonek, bfroehle, david.villa
2012-12-14 20:11:03gregory.p.smithsetmessageid: <>
2012-12-14 20:11:03gregory.p.smithlinkissue16612 messages
2012-12-14 20:11:03gregory.p.smithcreate