This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author Andy.Salnikov
Recipients Andy.Salnikov, eric.araujo, tarek, vinay.sajip
Date 2012-12-12.16:15:53
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1355328953.76.0.402975763886.issue16326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
OK, I see the problem. Do you think it would help if it tested both
sys.executable and its symlynk-resolved path against sys.exec_prefix
like this:

            if sys.executable.startswith(os.path.join(sys.exec_prefix, "bin")) or
                os.path.realpath(sys.executable).startswith(os.path.join(sys.exec_prefix, "bin")):
                # building third party extensions
                self.library_dirs.append(sysconfig.get_config_var('LIBDIR'))
            else:
                # building python standard extensions
                self.library_dirs.append('.')

Alternatively one can reverse the test. I guess that 'else:' is supposed
to apply when one builds new Python installation? Where does the 
sys.executable points to in this case? Is there any other (more reliable)
way to figure out that the standard extensions are being built instead of
third-party modules?

Andy
History
Date User Action Args
2012-12-12 16:15:53Andy.Salnikovsetrecipients: + Andy.Salnikov, vinay.sajip, tarek, eric.araujo
2012-12-12 16:15:53Andy.Salnikovsetmessageid: <1355328953.76.0.402975763886.issue16326@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-12-12 16:15:53Andy.Salnikovlinkissue16326 messages
2012-12-12 16:15:53Andy.Salnikovcreate