Message177274
I have updated the patch to work again with the current version of the _datetimemodule.
Regarding the suggestion of separating PEP3121 and PEP384. It might be true that datetime and other modules do not benefit directly from PEP 384, however it is still a fact that the stdlib modules should be seen as a set of reference modules, that are all implemented in a way that complies with the implementation fo the xxmodules.
I have talked with Martin von Löwis about this, and as far as I understood him correctly he also sees the PEP384 refactoring applied to the whole stdlib as a nessecary "signal" to other developers to refactor their modules accordingly.
Anyway I am planning to start to commit all of the open changes that I have created during my GSOC in the next few months. So a decision regarding this separation concern might be helpful. :-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-12-10 10:39:31 | Robin.Schreiber | set | recipients:
+ Robin.Schreiber, loewis, belopolsky, pitrou, asvetlov |
2012-12-10 10:39:30 | Robin.Schreiber | set | messageid: <1355135970.92.0.137553812426.issue15390@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-12-10 10:39:30 | Robin.Schreiber | link | issue15390 messages |
2012-12-10 10:39:30 | Robin.Schreiber | create | |
|