Message 176471 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	techtonik
Recipients	BreamoreBoy, amirouche, bob.ippolito, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, flox, ggenellina, r.david.murray, rhettinger, serhiy.storchaka, techtonik
Date	2012-11-27.10:50:42
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<CAPkN8x+Tppr2QtFU-4zc3LKfwr9DD6-cngaYN1YhOmE-CQ4VFQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-reply-to	<1353964506.13.0.799958334589.issue4945@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>

Content
On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Ezio Melotti <report@bugs.python.org>wrote: > I'm not sure the documentation should be changed. While boolean values > are accepted, user should prefer True/False, so the fact that you can pass > other things shouldn't be documented/advertized IMHO. > I'd raise that question on python-dev. > The patch has a couple of other changes that could be included though. > Yes, things that fall out of scope of this report should go into other reports. Otherwise we'll chat here for ages.

On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Ezio Melotti <report@bugs.python.org>wrote:

> I'm not sure the documentation should be changed.  While boolean values
> are accepted, user should prefer True/False, so the fact that you can pass
> other things shouldn't be documented/advertized IMHO.
>

I'd raise that question on python-dev.

> The patch has a couple of other changes that could be included though.
>

Yes, things that fall out of scope of this report should go into other
reports. Otherwise we'll chat here for ages.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-27 10:50:43	techtonik	set	recipients: + techtonik, rhettinger, bob.ippolito, ggenellina, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, r.david.murray, flox, BreamoreBoy, amirouche, serhiy.storchaka
2012-11-27 10:50:42	techtonik	link	issue4945 messages
2012-11-27 10:50:42	techtonik	create