This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author ncoghlan
Recipients chris.jerdonek, docs@python, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, ncoghlan, terry.reedy
Date 2012-11-25.10:51:45
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1353840705.24.0.477690366558.issue16209@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
The simpler approach Chris has taken here (i.e. just leaving the string methods separate from the class definition) also works.

Patch looks good to me - I'm definitely in favour of moving towards a more consistent approach of having the builtin function definitions reference to full class definitions (as shown by the changes I made to the docs for the other sequence types).
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-25 10:51:45ncoghlansetrecipients: + ncoghlan, terry.reedy, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, chris.jerdonek, docs@python
2012-11-25 10:51:45ncoghlansetmessageid: <1353840705.24.0.477690366558.issue16209@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-25 10:51:45ncoghlanlinkissue16209 messages
2012-11-25 10:51:45ncoghlancreate