Author pitrou
Recipients ncoghlan, pitrou, pmoody
Date 2012-11-23.06:54:59
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1353653642.3317.0.camel@localhost.localdomain>
In-reply-to <CADiSq7fqkBPOFsE52Ue+qnmaY+h6R3CRL8XBugi4FHqRTtqq1g@mail.gmail.com>
Content
> Sounds reasonable, especially as it also allows networks and interfaces
> with prefixes other than "/32" or "/128" to be easily constructed based on
> integer address values.
> 
> Should we also allow integers as the second argument, with the same prefix
> length meaning as the corresponding string?

IMO, yes.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-23 06:55:00pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, ncoghlan, pmoody
2012-11-23 06:55:00pitroulinkissue16531 messages
2012-11-23 06:54:59pitroucreate