➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author brett.cannon
Recipients Arfrever, Marc.Abramowitz, Ronan.Lamy, brett.cannon, eric.snow, jcea, ncoghlan
Date 2012-11-18.01:22:18
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1353201738.87.0.267674147972.issue15031@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
I can go with parse_cache_contents() as that aligns with imp.cache_from_source().

Does the API look reasonable (other than the parameter names since those would have to be renamed to be more in line with "cache")? Only thing I'm worried about.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-18 01:22:18brett.cannonsetrecipients: + brett.cannon, jcea, ncoghlan, Arfrever, eric.snow, Marc.Abramowitz, Ronan.Lamy
2012-11-18 01:22:18brett.cannonsetmessageid: <1353201738.87.0.267674147972.issue15031@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-18 01:22:18brett.cannonlinkissue15031 messages
2012-11-18 01:22:18brett.cannoncreate