Author pitrou
Recipients kristjan.jonsson, pitrou
Date 2012-11-16.13:55:23
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <63905856.241517818.1353074117248.JavaMail.root@zimbra10-e2.priv.proxad.net>
In-reply-to <1353059317.5.0.189776338269.issue16475@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
Content
> This change is specifically aimed at code objects.
> As it is, it is impossible to produce code objects that share common
> data (e.g. filename strings, common tuples, name strings, etc) that
> don't unserialize to separate objects.

Shouldn't strings be interned when the code object is unmarshalled?

> This change is based on work done at CCP to reduce the size of
> compiled code in memory.  Simple preprocessing of code objects prior
> to writing them to disk can result in important memory savings.

How important?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-16 13:55:23pitrousetrecipients: + pitrou, kristjan.jonsson
2012-11-16 13:55:23pitroulinkissue16475 messages
2012-11-16 13:55:23pitroucreate