Message175577
For maintenance releases, I think I would favor abbreviating the list only if it is "lossless" (e.g. for xrange objects). I think I would also be okay with abbreviating for arbitrary xranges -- in particular for arbitrary steps. For example, for xrange(0, 50, 3), I think something like the following might be better: "0, 3, 6, 9, ... 45, 48" (we could also include a difference hint). |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-14 17:14:00 | chris.jerdonek | set | recipients:
+ chris.jerdonek, terry.reedy, bethard, ezio.melotti, r.david.murray, docs@python, Juraj.Variny |
2012-11-14 17:13:59 | chris.jerdonek | set | messageid: <1352913239.92.0.228955714328.issue16418@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-14 17:13:59 | chris.jerdonek | link | issue16418 messages |
2012-11-14 17:13:59 | chris.jerdonek | create | |
|