This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author eric.snow
Recipients Thorney, eric.araujo, eric.snow, ezio.melotti, jackdied, ncoghlan, pitrou, python-dev, rhettinger
Date 2012-11-14.03:51:04
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1352865065.61.0.586605726674.issue12428@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
> Possibly reduce could be handled in a similar way with a fallback python
> implementation? Otherwise your suggestion of conditionally adding it to __all__
> makes sense to me.

In the meantime I'd expect the import of _functools.reduce to not be wrapped in a try block.  Does that have an impact on coverage?

>> * Should the pure Python partial only be used if _functools.partial is not available?
>> * Should _functools.partial be removed?
>
> What are the main considerations to properly answer these last questions? Performance
> comparison between the implementations, maintainability?

Sorry, the first time through I missed the part of the patch that tries to import _functools.partial _after_ the pure Python version is defined.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-11-14 03:51:05eric.snowsetrecipients: + eric.snow, rhettinger, ncoghlan, pitrou, jackdied, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, Thorney, python-dev
2012-11-14 03:51:05eric.snowsetmessageid: <1352865065.61.0.586605726674.issue12428@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-14 03:51:05eric.snowlinkissue12428 messages
2012-11-14 03:51:04eric.snowcreate