Message 175314 - Python tracker

➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author	mcjeff
Recipients	akira, eric.araujo, ezio.melotti, jhylton, mcjeff, nadeem.vawda, neologix, orsenthil, pitrou, python-dev, techtonik
Date	2012-11-11.04:31:48
SpamBayes Score	-1.0
Marked as misclassified	Yes
Message-id	<1352608309.01.0.835552644231.issue10050@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to

Content
Reverting of the len(block) back to 'bs' here aside, does it even make sense to include block information at all? That's the attempted read size, so it might not be an accurate representation of the size of the data actually read. Thus the reason for the initial change.

Reverting of the len(block) back to 'bs' here aside, does it even make sense to include block information at all? 

That's the attempted read size, so it might not be an accurate representation of the size of the data actually read.  Thus the reason for the initial change.

History
Date	User	Action	Args
2012-11-11 04:31:49	mcjeff	set	recipients: + mcjeff, jhylton, orsenthil, pitrou, techtonik, nadeem.vawda, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, neologix, akira, python-dev
2012-11-11 04:31:49	mcjeff	set	messageid: <1352608309.01.0.835552644231.issue10050@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-11-11 04:31:48	mcjeff	link	issue10050 messages
2012-11-11 04:31:48	mcjeff	create