Message175271
> The matter is not only in the fact that tests passed.
Right, but I don't want to introduce a regression :-)
> They should fail if the original bug occurs again. Have you tried to restore the bugs?
test_cmd_line_script.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #16218, changeset 23ebe277e982. I checked this issue: support_undecodable.patch checks for non-regression with UTF-8 (and ASCI and ISO-8859-1) locale encoding on UNIX.
test_genericpath.test_non_ascii() comes from the issue #3426, this fix comes from the issue #3187, changeset 8a7c930abab6. I don't want to spend time on trying the new test on this issue because this 8a7c930abab6 is a major change, I don't see how to revert it just to test the issue. I consider the issue has fixed, and the new test should not reduce the test coverage, but just increase it ;-) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-10 10:50:07 | vstinner | set | recipients:
+ vstinner, ezio.melotti, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-11-10 10:50:07 | vstinner | set | messageid: <1352544607.36.0.326227814274.issue16444@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-10 10:50:07 | vstinner | link | issue16444 messages |
2012-11-10 10:50:06 | vstinner | create | |
|