This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author lemburg
Recipients Arfrever, Giovanni.Bajo, PaulMcMillan, Vlado.Boza, alex, arigo, benjamin.peterson, camara, christian.heimes, dmalcolm, koniiiik, lemburg, mark.dickinson, serhiy.storchaka, vstinner
Date 2012-11-07.11:59:56
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <>
In-reply-to <>
On 07.11.2012 12:55, Mark Dickinson wrote:
> Mark Dickinson added the comment:
> [MAL]
>> I don't understand why we are only trying to fix the string problem
>> and completely ignore other key types.
> [Armin]
>> estimating the risks of giving up on a valid query for a truly random
>> hash, at an overestimated one billion queries per second ...
> That's fine in principle, but if this gets extended to integers, note that our current integer hash is about as far from 'truly random' as you can get:
>     Python 3.4.0a0 (default:f02555353544, Nov  4 2012, 11:50:12) 
>     [GCC 4.2.1 (Apple Inc. build 5664)] on darwin
>     Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>     >>> [hash(i) for i in range(20)]
>     [0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19]
> Moreover, it's going to be *very* hard to change the int hash while preserving the `x == y implies hash(x) == hash(y)` invariant across all the numeric types (int, float, complex, Decimal, Fraction, 3rd-party types that need to remain compatible).

Exactly. And that's why trying to find secure hash functions isn't
going to solve the problem. Together with randomization they may
make things better for strings, but they are no solution for numeric
types, and they also don't allow detecting possible attacks on your

But yeah, I'm repeating myself :-)
Date User Action Args
2012-11-07 11:59:56lemburgsetrecipients: + lemburg, arigo, mark.dickinson, vstinner, christian.heimes, benjamin.peterson, Arfrever, alex, dmalcolm, Giovanni.Bajo, PaulMcMillan, serhiy.storchaka, Vlado.Boza, koniiiik, camara
2012-11-07 11:59:56lemburglinkissue14621 messages
2012-11-07 11:59:56lemburgcreate