Message174793
My use case is decrypting files of 100's of megabytes. This is so slow that it is quite useless. About an hour or so.
I do agree that the encryption is worthless, but that is not important for my use case where I want to discourage people from reverse engineering the contents.
If it is so dangerous as some people have pointed out, it should be removed at the cost of not supporting a standard feature of ZIP files.
In my opinion you either support a feature and you support it good (efficient) or you don't. As it stands now, users will be disappointed in using a supported feature.
Some people argue that adding C code to Python is dangerous as it will lead to bugs, vulnerabilities etc.
You could dismiss every addition with C code to Python with this argument, so there must be some positive aspects to outweigh the negative side. The negative side is fairly small (50 lines of very simple C code), plus some standard Python glue code.
The benefit is a 100 fold increase in performance and the removal of 1 line of documentation telling that this feature is extremely slow.
(patch attached) |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-11-04 13:20:20 | rhdv | set | recipients:
+ rhdv, pitrou, r.david.murray, shashank, serhiy.storchaka |
2012-11-04 13:20:20 | rhdv | set | messageid: <1352035220.65.0.948092193536.issue10030@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-11-04 13:20:20 | rhdv | link | issue10030 messages |
2012-11-04 13:20:20 | rhdv | create | |
|