➜

This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author petri.lehtinen
Recipients docs@python, eric.araujo, petri.lehtinen, rhettinger
Date 2012-10-12.18:12:29
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1350065550.05.0.215937250705.issue15472@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content 
cycle() doesn't use seq, but p (p0, p1, ...). Others use seq (seq[0], seq[1], ...). How do you think these should be changed?
History
Date User Action Args
2012-10-12 18:12:30petri.lehtinensetrecipients: + petri.lehtinen, rhettinger, eric.araujo, docs@python
2012-10-12 18:12:30petri.lehtinensetmessageid: <1350065550.05.0.215937250705.issue15472@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-10-12 18:12:30petri.lehtinenlinkissue15472 messages
2012-10-12 18:12:29petri.lehtinencreate