Author exarkun
Recipients arjennienhuis, benjamin.peterson, eric.smith, exarkun, ezio.melotti, loewis, martin.panter, terry.reedy, uau, vstinner
Date 2012-10-02.12:05:43
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1349179543.6.0.0155718872257.issue3982@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Since Benjamin originally requested this feature, and then decided that he could accomplish his desired goal (ftplib porting, as far as I can tell) without it, I think that the "rejected" status is actually incorrect.  I think that Benjamin just wanted to indicate that he no longer needed the feature.  This doesn't mean that no one else will need the feature, and as it turns out the comments seem to reveal that other people do need the feature (also, I need the feature).

So, adjusting the ticket metadata to reflect that this is a valid feature request just waiting for someone to implement it, not a rejected idea that is not welcome in Python.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-10-02 12:05:43exarkunsetrecipients: + exarkun, loewis, terry.reedy, vstinner, eric.smith, benjamin.peterson, ezio.melotti, arjennienhuis, uau, martin.panter
2012-10-02 12:05:43exarkunsetmessageid: <1349179543.6.0.0155718872257.issue3982@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-10-02 12:05:43exarkunlinkissue3982 messages
2012-10-02 12:05:43exarkuncreate