Message169940
> see how type_new also computes the metaclass from the base classes.
As you can see from my first message, I originally considered PyType_FromSpecEx(PyObject *meta, PyType_Spec *spec) without bases. (In fact I was unaware of the recent addition of PyType_FromSpecWithBases.) Maybe the original signature makes more sense than the one in the patch. Explicitly setting a metaclass is most useful for the most basic type. On the other hand, a fully general function may eventually replace both PyType_FromSpec and PyType_FromSpecWithBases for most uses. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-09-06 20:50:03 | belopolsky | set | recipients:
+ belopolsky, loewis, amaury.forgeotdarc, Alexander.Belopolsky, Robin.Schreiber |
2012-09-06 20:50:03 | belopolsky | set | messageid: <1346964603.67.0.430361240082.issue15870@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-09-06 20:50:03 | belopolsky | link | issue15870 messages |
2012-09-06 20:50:02 | belopolsky | create | |
|