Message169325
I agree it's an acceptable risk for 3.3.0. Most third party decimal operations simply won't accept an explicit context argument at all - avoiding the need to pass the current context around explicitly is the whole point of it being stored in the thread locals.
However, I still think it would be better if consistency with the Python API could be restored for 3.3.1. If that's done via a more general "this value means the arg is actually missing" C API that can be made public in 3.4, so much the better. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-29 01:37:14 | ncoghlan | set | recipients:
+ ncoghlan, georg.brandl, rhettinger, mark.dickinson, ezio.melotti, Arfrever, skrah, zach.ware |
2012-08-29 01:37:14 | ncoghlan | set | messageid: <1346204234.72.0.592747386065.issue15783@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-08-29 01:37:14 | ncoghlan | link | issue15783 messages |
2012-08-29 01:37:13 | ncoghlan | create | |
|