This issue tracker has been migrated to GitHub, and is currently read-only.
For more information, see the GitHub FAQs in the Python's Developer Guide.

Author r.david.murray
Recipients asvetlov, chris.jerdonek, r.david.murray
Date 2012-08-25.00:54:57
SpamBayes Score -1.0
Marked as misclassified Yes
Message-id <1345856099.31.0.469527722962.issue14649@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
In-reply-to
Content
Personally I prefer to have the test case create the file(s) used in the test dynamically, writing them to the temporary working directory.  Since these are Python modules, you could use the helpers from script_helpers for this.

Otherwise I think your patch is OK.  I don't think we have a doc convention for "unfortunate implementation detail" :(  We have in the past put notes in the doc that say "this may change in the future", though that is usually about desired enhancements.  But perhaps it could apply here as well.
History
Date User Action Args
2012-08-25 00:54:59r.david.murraysetrecipients: + r.david.murray, asvetlov, chris.jerdonek
2012-08-25 00:54:59r.david.murraysetmessageid: <1345856099.31.0.469527722962.issue14649@psf.upfronthosting.co.za>
2012-08-25 00:54:58r.david.murraylinkissue14649 messages
2012-08-25 00:54:57r.david.murraycreate