Message169068
> Well, changing it to do that means changing functionality, which is disallowed at this point in the release process.
I think people used to “virtualenv .” can see this as a regression between virtualenv and pyvenv, but if the PEP did not list that use case then it’s too late. I’d suggest we even back out the “pyvenv --clear .” commit, which did not address the needs of the “virtualenv .” users. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-24 18:47:07 | eric.araujo | set | recipients:
+ eric.araujo, georg.brandl, vinay.sajip, pitrou, asvetlov, stefanholek, python-dev |
2012-08-24 18:47:07 | eric.araujo | set | messageid: <1345834027.05.0.0431802979866.issue15776@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-08-24 18:47:06 | eric.araujo | link | issue15776 messages |
2012-08-24 18:47:06 | eric.araujo | create | |
|