Message168960
The strict flag sounds good to me, too. I don't think it should be called "strict" though, as that would imply that we comply with RFC 4627 strictly (which is not true without passing allow_nan=False for dump() or passing a parse_constant function for load()). How about "encode_any" and "decode_any" or "any_value"?
Deprecation doesn't sound good to me. If the feature is already there, it probably has its users and use cases. |
|
Date |
User |
Action |
Args |
2012-08-23 19:20:21 | petri.lehtinen | set | recipients:
+ petri.lehtinen, rhettinger, pitrou, vstinner, ezio.melotti, eric.araujo, flox, thinred |
2012-08-23 19:20:20 | petri.lehtinen | set | messageid: <1345749620.92.0.848953090427.issue13212@psf.upfronthosting.co.za> |
2012-08-23 19:20:20 | petri.lehtinen | link | issue13212 messages |
2012-08-23 19:20:20 | petri.lehtinen | create | |
|